Major ClimateGate Scientist Comes Clean On Green

UPDATE 2: More trouble now looming for the IPCC as their data on hurricane activity (allegedly increasing) is in serious doubt

UPDATE: In yet another turn, Reuters reports that the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) now admits “flaws” in their reports on sea level risings. Of course, their totally inept findings of 2007 do nothing to dissuade them from claiming that the “overall” report about man effecting the warming is correct. GENIUS!

If you have not yet read about this Climate BOMB, check out the report coming out of the BBC:

Phil Jones Retreats On Climate Data

In a nutshell, the number one climate scientist in the world has admitted that he did not keep accurate data records, that the medieval times may have been warmer than now and that there has not been any ‘statistically’ significant warming since around 1995. (Whatever that means.) I highly doubt that this will soothe the slathering masses from pushing forth their radical change agenda, but if nothing else we have won a moral victory here.

The revolution is at hand. Will you be a leader or a follower?

Your Daily ClimateGate Briefing

Michael Mann, he of the Penn State Office of Climate Extremism, is “under investigation” by the university to see if his involvement in ClimateGate warrants any action (duh! Of course is does).

My personal opinion of this is that he should be fired, regardless of his status or tenure. Mann conspired with the East Anglia University climate goons to find ways to stifle dissent by changing the rules for peer review. He actively conspired to hide information by deleting pertinent emails that were being requested by a Freedom of Information Act. That alone should land him in jail. However, as much grant money (TAX DOLLARS) he brings in for his religious research (which is obscene) this will be swept under the rug by those UNIVERSITY MEMBERS who are investigating.

Michelle Malkin has more on her site.

The revolution is at hand. Will you be a leader or a follower?

Al Gore Can Save The World

Myron Ebell has an article over at Icecap that everyone should read.

If we took all of Al Gore’s books and had a massive book burning, just think of how many homes in Britain we could heat! Record low temperatures are occurring around the world, and not just in the Northern reaches. This past week, Cuba set record lows as well, with temps around 5.3C.

Imagine that. Sun spot activity is low. But not only that, the magnetic field around the sun, which drives the sunspots, is at an ALL-TIME low. The low magnetic activity correlates to low sunspot activity, which correlates to cooler temperatures. Do I now qualify as a climate expert?

Of course, our Glorious Leader completely ignores the facts and calls for a few BILLION more to pump into the job-killing green movement. Is it November yet? Geez.

The revolution is at hand. Will you be a leader or a follower?

Next Up, GoreGate

I won’t even try to comment on this. I just want you to savor it with me. ManBearPig stuck himself while speaking out in Copenhagen (which I thought he had skipped, but apparently could not avoid the large sums of money he gets for speaking or a chance to influence the BILLIONS he will be getting because of Climate-scam Leftist-lation)

From the Times UK

There are many kinds of truth. Al Gore was poleaxed by an inconvenient one yesterday.

The former US Vice-President, who became an unlikely figurehead for the green movement after narrating the Oscar-winning documentary An Inconvenient Truth, became entangled in a new climate change “spin” row.

Mr Gore, speaking at the Copenhagen climate change summit, stated the latest research showed that the Arctic could be completely ice-free in five years.

In his speech, Mr Gore told the conference: “These figures are fresh. Some of the models suggest to Dr [Wieslav] Maslowski that there is a 75 per cent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during the summer months, could be completely ice-free within five to seven years.”

However, the climatologist whose work Mr Gore was relying upon dropped the former Vice-President in the water with an icy blast.

“It’s unclear to me how this figure was arrived at,” Dr Maslowski said. “I would never try to estimate likelihood at anything as exact as this.”

Mr Gore’s office later admitted that the 75 per cent figure was one used by Dr Maslowksi as a “ballpark figure” several years ago in a conversation with Mr Gore.

Imagine that. Al Gore spinning lies to get folks to believe in the idiocy he is spewing.

The revolution is at hand. Will you be a leader or a follower?

Kyoto Part Deux

Next month, the Chicken Littles of Climate Change will descend on Copenhagen like a plague of locusts sent by the demon Pazuzu in the classic horror tale The Exorcist. They will seek to strong arm the world into giving up their sovereignty to the United Nations, who know what is best for us and so should be the ones to tell us what is best for the environment.

The last great meeting of the minds was in 1997 when the Kyoto Treaty was forged and signed by most nations. Luckily for us the United States was not so stupid as to buy into the scam. yes, our president signed it, but our Senate refused to ratify it. The actual treaty took effect in 2005. The proponents hail it as having worked well, and now want to expand / extend Kyoto with the Copenhagen version.

Well, then, let us take a look at just what Kyoto has done for us. From Heritage.org:

Even aside from the growing doubts about the seriousness of the global warming threat — the Kyoto Protocol or any other putative global warming solution is only a solution to the extent that a genuine problem exists in the first place — the Kyoto Protocol has failed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.[1] Emissions are increasing in several signatory nations. In several more countries, emissions are declining more slowly than emissions in the U.S., which ironically is not a party to Kyoto.[2]

For example, according to U.N. data, the U.S. reduced emissions by 3 percent from 2000 to 2006, while the 27 European signatories increased their emissions by 0.1 percent.[3] Germany’s emissions declined by only 1.7 percent, while Canada’s emissions rose 21.3 percent.[4] European Environmental Agency data show that emissions increased in Austria, Finland, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, and Spain in the decade after the 1997 Kyoto Protocol.[5]

Yes, Virginia, there is a Global Warming Scam out there.

The revolution is at hand, will you be a leader or a follower?

———————————————————————————————–

[1]. Press release, "UNFCC: Rising Industrialized Countries Emissions Underscore Urgent Need for Political Action on Climate Change," U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, November 16, 2008, athttp://unfccc.int/files/press/news_room/press_releases_and_

advisories/application/pdf/081117_ghg_press_release.pdf (December 11, 2008); U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, "International Energy Annual 2006," Table H.1co2, athttp://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/tableh1co2.xls(December 11, 2008); Open Europe, "Europe’s Dirty Secret: Why the EU Emissions Trading Scheme Isn’t Working," August 2007, athttp://www.openeurope.org.uk/research/etsp2.pdf (December 11, 2008).

[2]. U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2008 Inventory Reports and Common Reporting Formats.

[3]. Ibid.

[4]. Ibid.

[5]. European Environment Agency, Annual European Community Greenhouse Gas Inventory, 1990-2007 and Inventory Report 2009, May 27, 2009, p. 16, Table ES.7, at http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/european-

community-greenhouse-gas-inventory-2009/european-

community-ghg-inventory-2014-full-report.pdf (November 10, 2009).

[6]. Matthew Sinclair, "The Expensive Failure of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme," TaxPayers’ Alliance, October 2009, athttp://www.taxpayersalliance.com/ets.pdf (November 10, 2009).

My Favorite Topic

Just when I think I cannot get any more good information about the scam known as Global Warming Climate Change, I come across an article that really gives me hope.

Firstly, while I am ecstatic about the revelation of scientific buffoonery, I want to go on record as believing that the culprits who stole the data need to be arrested and prosecuted. (Ok, I am rooting that they don’t get caught. After all, sometimes you have to have a recon group go deep into enemy territory to find what you need. But they DID break the law, so I will not feel sorry if they get arrested.)

For those who don’t know what I am talking about, it seems that hackers broke into a prominent CLIMATE CHANGE group’s email system. In there were damning messages and documents that showed how those inside tried to manipulate the data and outright lie in order to promote AGW and to squeeze out dissenters.

Good. Let the battle rage on. I have no doubt that the authors of those letters will cry foul and say the messages were falsified.

Read more here.

The revolution is at hand. Will you be a leader or a follower?

SPPI Monthly CO2 Report

From my favorite global climate change folks:

SPPI’s authoritative Monthly CO2 Report for June 2009 reveals that global hurricane activity is at a 50-year low, casting doubt on the accuracy of projections that “global warming” would lead to more intense hurricanes. These and other disasters that are said to be happening are not happening.

Imagine that. The cooling trend has been affecting the ocean temperatures, which in turn reduce the amount of energy picked up by hurricanes. The report continues:

The IPCC assumes CO2 concentration will reach 836 ppmv by 2100, but, for almost eight years, CO2 concentration has headed straight for only 575 ppmv by 2100. This alone halves all of the IPCC’s temperature projections.

Since 1980 temperature has risen at only 2.5F (1.5C)/century, not the 7 F (3.9C) the IPCC imagines.

I will continue to be a man-made global warming denier for as long as simple facts refute the alarmists’ claims. I am no climate guru. I see the facts. I believe that we have lots of work to do in cleaning up our environment. But calling a naturally-occurring gas as a pollutant? Sorry, I don’t buy it. And until you chicken-little eco-freaks present me with something reliable and proven, go back to your labs and write reports designed to garner you more grant money.

The revolution is at hand. Will you be a leader or a follower?