Glorious Leader is finally going to keep a campaign promise. He is going to cut spending from the budget. At last! Change we can believe in. These cuts will be deep and pervasive. All 100 million of it. Which, according to my calculations, is about 1/35,000th of the budget he just proposed. This is sort [...]
Archive for the ‘budget’ Category
Obama Actually Keeps A Promise
Posted in budget, obama, stupidity on April 20, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
Insane Republicans Reveal An Insane Budget Plan
Posted in blog, budget, Republican on April 3, 2009 | 3 Comments »
From a comment I made at HuffPo. My head nearly exploded while reading the comments there to a retarded article saying the Republican budget proposal was stupid: I find it interesting how Obama is ‘helping working class’ people by raising their taxes? 60 cents on tobacco, which a larger percentage of low-income people use, cap [...]
No Such Thing As Baby Steps
Posted in America, budget, congress, democrats, liberal agenda, nationalize, politics on April 3, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
From the NYT today: The House and Senate approved budgets of about $3.5 trillion for the government on Thursday with no Republican support, a sign of deep partisan tensions likely to color Congressional efforts to enact major policy initiatives sought by President Obama. On the heels of House approval of its spending plan for 2010, [...]
More Media Collapse
Posted in budget, economy, media, stimulus on March 27, 2009 | 1 Comment »
The Associated Press (AP) recently published an article examining the ‘fuzzy’ math of the non-stimulus package. Although they did not say it in so many words, I will: the numbers put forth by the congressional charlatans in charge were pulled from the nether regions of the Wicked Witch of the West, Lurch (Reid) and Glorious [...]
Buget Office Gives the REAL Numbers
Posted in budget, CBO, economy, stimulus on March 20, 2009 | 1 Comment »
UPDATE: Michelle Malkin has the CBO numbers. A few weeks back, if you may recall, our Glorious Leader spearheaded the passing of a $787 billion non-stimulus package. It was their answer to the great economic crisis, a crisis brought about by spending too much money on consumption and no money on production. It is obvious [...]
